A pharmacy program’s first-time licensure pass rate was falling. A root-cause analysis exposed opportunities for growth in how the curriculum was assessed.
A full curriculum revision followed — a turnaround to #1 in the state, top 5 nationally.
Is This You?
Teaching, leading, reporting — or all three.
Education evaluation lives in every corner of the institution. Here’s where most educators find their entry point.
- Teaching or administering a K–12 program with state reporting requirements
- Running a higher-ed initiative, grant-funded course, or academic program
- Going through reaccreditation and need a thorough, defensible self-study
- Developing new curriculum and want evidence it’s working before you scale
- Tracking student outcomes and looking for patterns worth addressing
- Evaluating whether an intervention — tutoring, technology, support services — moves the needle
- Writing a grant that requires an evaluation plan but unsure where to begin
- Generating data for a board, legislature, or accreditation body
What We Do for You
Rigorous evaluation from the classroom to the accreditor.
We’ve worked on micro-evaluations of individual courses and macro root-cause analyses that reshaped whole curricula. The right scope depends on your question.
Program & Curriculum Evaluation
- Formative evaluation while programs are still forming
- Summative evaluation for end-of-year or end-of-grant reporting
- Curriculum alignment and coherence studies
- Root-cause analysis when outcomes aren’t where they should be
- Intervention effectiveness (tutoring, SEL, technology, etc.)
Assessment & Outcomes
- Assessment design and content validation
- Student outcome measurement: retention, progression, completion
- Pass-rate and licensure exam analysis
- Disaggregated data review — who is thriving, and who isn’t
- Equity-informed interpretation of results
Accreditation Support
- Self-study design and facilitation
- Data collection for standard-by-standard documentation
- Writing support for criterion narratives
- Continuous improvement planning and evidence mapping
- Site-visit preparation materials
Grant & Reporting
- Evaluation plan writing for grant applications
- Logic model and theory of change development
- Annual and final reporting to state agencies and funders
- Dissemination materials for practitioners and the public
- Data storytelling for non-technical audiences
How It Works
From question to evidence — and back to practice.
Good evaluation in education starts with understanding the instructional context, not just the data. We learn your environment before we recommend a method.
Discover
What are you trying to learn? What decisions will this evidence support?
Align
Map your program theory — what you do, what you expect, and for whom.
Measure
Design or adapt instruments: assessments, surveys, interview protocols.
Analyze
Quantitative and qualitative analysis appropriate to your evidence.
Report
Clear findings for each audience: accreditors, funders, faculty, or students.
Improve
Actionable recommendations that feed directly back into the next cycle.
What the Work Reveals
Evidence that changed programs.
ESL students were four times as likely to face a dismissal or repeat-year decision compared to their peers.
Grant-funded tutoring and language support helped them progress on par — and in some years, better.
First-generation students were leaving, lacking support to navigate financial aid and housing most take for granted.
Targeted onboarding and counseling improved retention for the students who needed it most.
Examples are anonymized. Detailed reports exist but are held under NDA.
Ready to measure what your program is actually doing?
Share the question — whether it’s one course or a whole institution. The first conversation will leave you with clarity about a path forward.
Start the conversation